A END OF THE COMMON SENSE AND GOOD DOGS. - Page 13

Just to clairify - Garrison and maybe some others here think that since they own a dog they have the "right" to starve it to death if that suits their fancy?

Blitzen

PLEASE don't make me put you in the stupid pile. I said nothing like that at all. What is it that stops the ability to read the words without adding things that were not said?

1 question for you. What would you do with an infestation of mice and rats?

Here are some other things to consider.  You probably eat, chicken,pork, beef, all creatures of the sea. Do you eat dog, cat, horse ect. why not?

My animals belong to me and I should be able to do with as I please. I own them and their rights are very limited

What does this mean, Garrison?

BTW I didn't appreciate your comment about putting me on your stupid pile because of what you said above.  Do you think I'm the only person who wondered what you meant? And don't send me anymore PM's. Say what you have to say here or keep it to yourself.

Then ask do not assume. What you said was stupid.

Now to answer your question, but I will ask some questions my self.

Dog condition of the correct weight is very different to many people. Some will keep a dog thin and others will call that starving them. While others will have their dog fat and say its the right thing to do. Other let their dogs do what ever they want and effect others negatively and think that is okay. Where is the right and wrong line and who get to decide what that is? 

There is little doubt I buy more animal feed then most on this board and I take very good care of them. My point is what gives you the "right" to say how anyone treats their animals? Nothing. People should mind their own business and get their own house in order and let others do the same. While you set on you ass bitching about others, I am working, paying a lot of taxes that are being spent trying to force others to live by animal activist opinions.

It is not the governments job to police animal welfare, how you mow your yard, or any other differing opinion you might come up with.

If you want to control something control yourself.

PM me your cell number and I will send you lots of pictures including 250 cattle well taken care of  and 30 dogs that work for a living. What do you do for the benefit of this country.

Hans - do I really need to remind you that Hitler called his programme
​"National Socialism";  he never really claimed to be a follower of Karl
Marx's Communist philosophy, nor does much of what he thought should
be done (including wiping out 6 million or so) fit with Engels, Lenin etc.
Personnally I am nearer to a Trotskyist, than a Nazi !  (I'm not a Stalinist,
either, btw).  That people (you) can argue there are 'fine lines' between Right
and Left precisely proves my point that it is  a slippery slope.

Paul - your wife may have 'many, many rights' NOW - but did she (women)
always ?  Who fought for and changed that situation, the GOP ?
 

I did ask.

Look, Paul, I couldn't care less what you do with your dogs.. I simply asked what you meant when you said -  dog owners should be able to do whatever they want with their dogs. You made it sound af it anything goes. I did say - just to clarify and put it in the form of question.

I'll pass on sending you my phone number. If all those cattle dogs are yours that's great. Keep up the good work.  I do nothing you would approve of to benefit the country and, frankly I don't share my business or person life on the internet. BTW my dog still sleeps in my bed.

Hundmutter

I am not a Republican but I'm for damn sure not a Democrat. My wife and I both have lost rights because of mind set of many on this thread. That being of left wing socialist that try to take away my rights. I personally have no doubt you are a socialist and believe you should have the right to be, in the USA. But you are not in the USA are you? I do not know about the rights of the people of other countries.

Many of my rights in my house, are given to me by my wife, and my wife has many right because of me, frankly because we care about the other more then ourselves.

I do not believe any non-American has the right to complain about how things are done in America by Americans, especially to the countries we fund in aid.

Blitzen

Good for you and you dog I am glad that works for you. My dog still sleeps outside.
You did not ask until you accused me of being one who agrees with starving a dog to death.    "Just to clairify - Garrison and maybe some others here think that since they own a dog they have the "right" to starve it to death if that suits their fancy?"

What I did say was mind your own business. Perfect your own life before you try to fix others.

My point is just because you believe your dog should sleep on your bed does not mean it is wrong for me to leave my dogs outside. To a lot of extreme animal folks that is the difference between good treatment and abuse.  That is my premise of "mind your own business", because it is just opinion. It is neither right or wrong to most people. If it is wrong for you, do not do it.  I am saying do not push your beliefs on everyone else.

Funny I thought we were talking about the universal topic of
which tools and methods were 'common sense' & produced
good dogs, not homeland or foreign Policy by Government.
It is you two who have introduced political affiliation.