New England Regionals - Page 2

Amazing, no entries owned by Wilhendorf, not even a co-owner, does this have anything to do with OG Westconn being suspended from the USA?

****Just a quick question, has anyone ever seen a young VA dog placed behind two older V rated dogs before?**** happens many times, just because a dog is VA someplace in time does not mean that every judge feels he is "VA" and does not mean he HAS to place a dog 1st because it went VA somewhere else *****Amazing, no entries owned by Wilhendorf, not even a co-owner, does this have anything to do with OG Westconn being suspended from the USA?***** npatel, where you at the show? if so then you would have noticed that team Wilhendorf was there to support a fellow USA club AND also there to handle for fellow friends in the breed. they are also there to mentore and help these fellow clubs, members and associates in the breed to learn and do well. never understood, why must a successful kennel ALWAYS have to show if they dont show, their club is suspended????? von Wilhendorf is a Kennel, OG Wesconn is a club, what does one have to do with the other?

*********Reply Dawnmarie, you failed to include the breeder of V1 Hailey von Grafenstein Patti Schmersal. *********** kathy, i didnt fail to do anything, the thought of paying tribute to that person never even crossed my mind. i dont know about you... but when my puppies go to working and show homes and the homes work their a$$ses off night and day working the dogs, trialing the dogs, training the dogs, paying for the training etc.... i give recognition to them, the owners, they invested the money and the time into these dogs.. sure i bred them and did all the homework for the breeding, but there is no rule that says a breeder must get a pat on the back for a dog that some breeders could care less about, after it leaves their home. although i keep in touch with all but one home in 7yrs... i dont expect my puppy people to scream across the internet that i bred the dog... if anyone is interested, they will ask the owners. i would definately be proud but would not force people to pay tribute to me as breeder, as you wish for us to do. ***** and of course we all know that Ingo was cut short of his show career by a tragic accident. *********** and your point is? what does this have to do with the results of this show??? *****(and to John for handling Patti's girl to V1). ******* LMAO and the last time you gave a damn about the handler of Hailey was when?????? ***** hope that Patti gets a "thank you" and gets to enjoy a part of this success******** I must have missed something, but the show catalog i saw had Megan as owner its "megans girl" i have no idea who Patti is but i can guarantee this person had nothing to do with that female going V1. she can enjoy anything she wants but i bet she would agree she had nothing to do with the placing of the female... it was her ring training, excellent physical condition and living in a loving home with a dedicated awesome family!!

Dawnmarie, I found your hostility to be quite unwarranted. If you would take the time to read this thread you would see that I had asked if a listing o the results was posted and made it clear that I was not at the event. And I note that for the first time in several years, that Wilhendorf did not own an entry in this regional event. What ever you issue is with others, do not include me. You are uncouth and uninformed. Naren

Hi Naren, thats unfortunate you misread my post. how does one decifer "hostility" online? actually, i would imagine, if you were in a "hostile" mood, then i suppose you would read something with "hostility" sorry you misread the post... you are entitled to make a wrong assumption :) its kewl! dont worry bout it :) I was at the show and had no idea of the results, so it would not be clear to me if you were at the show or not for asking for results. sorry you couldnt make it, the show was awesome.. lots of fun!! **** And I note that for the first time in several years, that Wilhendorf did not own an entry in this regional event. ***** I did, however, miss the part of your post where you noted "for the first time in several years" i do not see that in your previous post that i quoted from, i see you just now used those words, tho. *****You are uncouth and uninformed.******* Curious, What is it that I am "uninformed" about? I am a busy girl... but usually know what's "going on". uncouth? i would rather call myself "honest" and "to the point" not necessary wasting peoples time nor sugar coating things that grown people should should just deal with :) *****What ever you issue is with others, do not include me**** its easier for me to post one post at a time, to answer questions, it was not my intent to associate you with kathyp, my post were replys, not issues. i do not know the woman so therefore have no issues with her :) simply stating facts, no issues