This is a placeholder text
Group text
by darylehret on 15 March 2012 - 02:03
by Slamdunc on 15 March 2012 - 02:03
by desertstorm3115 on 15 March 2012 - 03:03
by darylehret on 15 March 2012 - 03:03
by Blitzen on 15 March 2012 - 03:03
by desertstorm3115 on 15 March 2012 - 03:03
by Slamdunc on 15 March 2012 - 03:03
Since you started this thread and put the bulls eye on your back; can you post the AKC registration for NYX? I know you have stated that your dogs are "registerable." I would think that NYX is also AKC registered.
by desertstorm3115 on 15 March 2012 - 04:03
by workingdogz on 15 March 2012 - 09:03
Not sure who 'Jen' is.
MY wife called AKC on 03-13-2012 at
1:32PM #919-233-9767 and spoke
to a customer service rep. The call
lasted 17 minutes including hold time.
She asked about having the individual
AKC registration confirmed on two dogs,
Nyx and Hutch.
The spelling of their names was taken from
your website. She was told by the AKC rep
that NEITHER dog was their registry.
Perhaps you may want to check with AKC or your
website to ensure there are no spelling errors to
prevent this from happening if someone else calls
to verify.
I will indeed apologize to you here on this thread now
and the one I started in regards to 'Hutch" not being
individually AKC registered.
However, I will also stand behind what
was told to my spouse by an AKC rep on that day.
by Slamdunc on 15 March 2012 - 15:03
The topic is about "kennel blindness" which is breeding untitled, un registered dogs, with out health tests because the owner (not breeder) thinks they are worthy of breeding for some reason. That my friend is kennel blindness, IMO. Just because you bought a dog from a well known kennel who has spent decades breeding does not make you a breeder or your dog worthy of being bred. Because your dogs may have a couple of famous dogs in their pedigree, does not make them breed worthy. Not having an AKC registration on a litter of puppies, when the owner (not Breeder) of the dogs lives in the US is very sad. Brother/sister, father/daughter matings of untitled, untested, no health tests, dogs with fair conformaton at best may be a sign of kennel blindness. Stating, "I breed for myself" and then advertising puppies from unregistered parents, with out hip x rays, or any other health tests for sale.....that may not be breeding for your self?????????????????? When your female has had close to 20 puppies in the past year or so; are you really breeding for yourself? Or just trying to raise a little extra cash. I would say this would be the extreme example of kennel blindness.
When a person states that the AKC is not a stamp of quality (which I agree), SchH is not a breed worthiness test, doesn't work his dogs at all in anything, might be kennel blind to think his dogs are breed worthy. I could go to the shelter and find similar dogs, if I just wanted a dog for myself as a nice pet.
Thanks for trying to keep the thread on topic, sometimes threads can stray or change course a little. Hope that was on topic enough for you.
Kennel blindness: Thinking that you and your dogs are so superior to everyone else that you do not need to conform to the standard, do health screenings, show your dogs, title or work your dogs to prove their greatness, or at the bare minimum even AKC register your dogs. If one of these great pups went to a working home it would be considered a mix breed, not eligible to be shown, and scorebooks would list it as a mix. That might be a sign of kennel blindness and many other things. Breeding with out even being able to prove your dogs are pure bred, might be a clue.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top