This is a placeholder text
Group text
by mking on 16 September 2009 - 23:09
Mystere- Will you be forwarding the copy of the thread to the appropriate organisations? I would think anyone publicly admitting to dyeing, etc. could surely be banned from any future shows etc. This thread is like watching "Americas Dumbest Criminals" only live, LOL.
by GSDSRULE on 16 September 2009 - 23:09
Victoria Driggs, people like you make me sick.
by Mystere on 17 September 2009 - 00:09
quote:
"Mystere- Will you be forwarding the copy of the thread to the appropriate organisations? I would think anyone publicly admitting to dyeing, etc. could surely be banned from any future shows etc. This thread is like watching "Americas Dumbest Criminals" only live, LOL. "
Isn't it, though? Can you imagine that anyone so arrogant is also so damned stupid? I mean, she changes her name from Driggs to Roe. Changes the kennel name from Gold-berg to Vom Berlin, but is so damned stupid that she thinks no one will realize it is her, with oversize Jando and her other dogs on the website???
Please!!
Victoria Driggs aka Victoria Roe aka Gold-berg Kennels aka Vom Berlin.
Then, to top it off, she comes and takes a thread that had to be on the 4th or 5th page a week later and BRINGS IT BACK TO THE TOP!! She adds insult to her self-inflicted injury by admitting she dyes dogs and trying to justify it as"okay." WHAT???? Finally, she finishes up acting like a whiney second-grader : "you're just jealous!" Huh? of what??? As Hermione said, "What an idiot."
The fact is that for any non-regional or national event, a USA club can reject any entry. Victoria was put on notice a few years ago that Willamette Schutzhund Club would not accept any show entries from her. The only other USA club along the I-5 corridor that hosts shows is Snohomish, and they know about her, too. So do the Canadians. Willamette will host the regional conformation show next year, so that will be the one show where the club cannot just outright reject an entry out of hand. But....that does not mean, given her admissions, that they are necessarily obligated to just accept any entry from her.
As I said, she has not shown for some time, now, AFAIK. Apparently, she has just that much sense. I would be stunned so much you'd be able to fan me with a brick, if she were stupid enough send an entry to any show in the region...especially after being dumb enough to bring this thread back from the dead.
"Mystere- Will you be forwarding the copy of the thread to the appropriate organisations? I would think anyone publicly admitting to dyeing, etc. could surely be banned from any future shows etc. This thread is like watching "Americas Dumbest Criminals" only live, LOL. "
Isn't it, though? Can you imagine that anyone so arrogant is also so damned stupid? I mean, she changes her name from Driggs to Roe. Changes the kennel name from Gold-berg to Vom Berlin, but is so damned stupid that she thinks no one will realize it is her, with oversize Jando and her other dogs on the website???
Please!! Victoria Driggs aka Victoria Roe aka Gold-berg Kennels aka Vom Berlin.
Then, to top it off, she comes and takes a thread that had to be on the 4th or 5th page a week later and BRINGS IT BACK TO THE TOP!! She adds insult to her self-inflicted injury by admitting she dyes dogs and trying to justify it as"okay." WHAT???? Finally, she finishes up acting like a whiney second-grader : "you're just jealous!" Huh? of what??? As Hermione said, "What an idiot."
The fact is that for any non-regional or national event, a USA club can reject any entry. Victoria was put on notice a few years ago that Willamette Schutzhund Club would not accept any show entries from her. The only other USA club along the I-5 corridor that hosts shows is Snohomish, and they know about her, too. So do the Canadians. Willamette will host the regional conformation show next year, so that will be the one show where the club cannot just outright reject an entry out of hand. But....that does not mean, given her admissions, that they are necessarily obligated to just accept any entry from her.
As I said, she has not shown for some time, now, AFAIK. Apparently, she has just that much sense. I would be stunned so much you'd be able to fan me with a brick, if she were stupid enough send an entry to any show in the region...especially after being dumb enough to bring this thread back from the dead.
by animules on 17 September 2009 - 22:09
Nia, it's saved. 
by Mystere on 19 September 2009 - 00:09
New rules for the NASS:
When entering a dog in a GSDCA‐WDA sanctioned conformation show, the participant, including
without limitation the dog’s owner, the owner’s representative and the exhibitor expressly grants
permission to the GSDCA‐WDA to take, examine and analyze samples of the dog’s coat to determine
whether the color or pigmentation of the dog’s coat has been manipulated or altered. The sample may
be taken by the judge or any person designated by either the judge or the GSDCA‐WDA. Such samples
shall be sent to the GSDCA‐WDA Office for examination and analysis. If it is determined that the
pigment of the dog’s coat has been manipulated or altered in any manner, then the cost of the
examination and analysis shall be borne by the owner and the show rating awarded to the dog at the
show shall become null and void ab initio. A Disciplinary Complaint shall be lodged automatically against
the responsible parties, including without limitation the dog’s owner, the owner’s representative and
the exhibitor. If it is determined that the pigment of the dog’s coat has not been manipulated, then the
cost of the examination and analysis shall be borne by the GSDCA‐WDA.
No dog that has had any procedure performed upon it or any device that has been applied to it may be
presented in any GSDCA‐WDA conformation show, if such procedure or device misleads or deceives a judge about the true condition of a dog at a conformation show. If it is determined that any dog entered
into a GSDCA‐WDA sanctioned conformation show has been unacceptably altered, then (a) the show
rating awarded to said dog shall become null and void ab initio and (b) a disciplinary complaint shall be
lodged automatically against the parties who are responsible for the unacceptable alterations, including
without limitation the dog’s owner, the owner’s representative and the exhibitor. In such an instance,
(a) the dog shall be banned from all future GSDCA‐WDA events and (b) the GSDCA‐WDA membership of
the parties responsible for such unacceptable alterations, including without limitation the owner, the
owner’s representative and the exhibitor, shall be terminated. For purposes of this provision,
temporary ear forms applied to or used on a dog’s ears shall not disqualify the dog from presentation in
any GSDCA‐WDA conformation show.
When entering a dog in a GSDCA‐WDA sanctioned conformation show, the participant, including
without limitation the dog’s owner, the owner’s representative and the exhibitor expressly grants
permission to the GSDCA‐WDA to take, examine and analyze samples of the dog’s coat to determine
whether the color or pigmentation of the dog’s coat has been manipulated or altered. The sample may
be taken by the judge or any person designated by either the judge or the GSDCA‐WDA. Such samples
shall be sent to the GSDCA‐WDA Office for examination and analysis. If it is determined that the
pigment of the dog’s coat has been manipulated or altered in any manner, then the cost of the
examination and analysis shall be borne by the owner and the show rating awarded to the dog at the
show shall become null and void ab initio. A Disciplinary Complaint shall be lodged automatically against
the responsible parties, including without limitation the dog’s owner, the owner’s representative and
the exhibitor. If it is determined that the pigment of the dog’s coat has not been manipulated, then the
cost of the examination and analysis shall be borne by the GSDCA‐WDA.
No dog that has had any procedure performed upon it or any device that has been applied to it may be
presented in any GSDCA‐WDA conformation show, if such procedure or device misleads or deceives a judge about the true condition of a dog at a conformation show. If it is determined that any dog entered
into a GSDCA‐WDA sanctioned conformation show has been unacceptably altered, then (a) the show
rating awarded to said dog shall become null and void ab initio and (b) a disciplinary complaint shall be
lodged automatically against the parties who are responsible for the unacceptable alterations, including
without limitation the dog’s owner, the owner’s representative and the exhibitor. In such an instance,
(a) the dog shall be banned from all future GSDCA‐WDA events and (b) the GSDCA‐WDA membership of
the parties responsible for such unacceptable alterations, including without limitation the owner, the
owner’s representative and the exhibitor, shall be terminated. For purposes of this provision,
temporary ear forms applied to or used on a dog’s ears shall not disqualify the dog from presentation in
any GSDCA‐WDA conformation show.
by raymond on 20 September 2009 - 17:09
A step in the right direction!
by Euro1 on 21 September 2009 - 18:09
by Mystere on 24 September 2009 - 00:09
by crhuerta on 24 September 2009 - 00:09
***might be several un-happy exhibitors.........so sad...too bad!
by mobjack on 24 September 2009 - 01:09
WHOOHOO!!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
