This is a placeholder text
Group text
by ShelleyR on 24 September 2009 - 19:09
With my luck I'd screw up the dye recipe and end up with a Black and PINK male anyway. LOL
SS
SS
by Liesjers on 24 September 2009 - 22:09
What if you have a dog that really is pretty black? Now will people look at you with suspicion?
by Mystere on 24 September 2009 - 22:09
It's not the black dogs that are being dyed. It is the B & R show dogs that are being dyed. But, if you are talking about a particularly deep and glossy black on a show dog...yeah, that might be suspect. Easy solution: Don't dye the dog. 
by Liesjers on 25 September 2009 - 00:09
Yeah that's what I mean. Now all the dogs that actually did have nice color will be looked at with suspicion, lol.
by ShelleyR on 25 September 2009 - 02:09
For Sale-
Dog hair. Deep red-brown color.
Reasonably priced.
You harvest. BYOB (Bring Your Own Bag)
Dog hair. Deep red-brown color.
Reasonably priced.
You harvest. BYOB (Bring Your Own Bag)
by usatoday on 27 September 2009 - 18:09
Your damnned right the Canadians know about her. Dysplasic hips, inherited immune diseases ect. Refusal to hand over papers - among other things.
It is all well and good for us to vent and/or use this board to warn potential victims, but isn't there anything we as a whole or as an individual can do to stop this woman? At least from being able to register her dogs?
The last time I looked on both sites, it was almost like a liquidation of her breeding stock. I have a feeling that she is liquidating, then getting ready to start over again. What a travesty.
On a side note: I was saddened to read all of the personal attacks on Victoria. I feel that it cheapens the facts posted here and what this thread is meant to do - warn the public and express our grievences. Someone's physical appearance has absolutely nothing to do with being a dishonest and blatantly dispicable breeder. This is about German Shepherds. Just my opinion.
It is all well and good for us to vent and/or use this board to warn potential victims, but isn't there anything we as a whole or as an individual can do to stop this woman? At least from being able to register her dogs?
The last time I looked on both sites, it was almost like a liquidation of her breeding stock. I have a feeling that she is liquidating, then getting ready to start over again. What a travesty.
On a side note: I was saddened to read all of the personal attacks on Victoria. I feel that it cheapens the facts posted here and what this thread is meant to do - warn the public and express our grievences. Someone's physical appearance has absolutely nothing to do with being a dishonest and blatantly dispicable breeder. This is about German Shepherds. Just my opinion.
by luvdogs on 29 September 2009 - 20:09
Is it just the one puppy thing or is there more? Would someone who had a dog from there need to have it DNA'd or something to make sure it is who it is supposed to be? I think the change to vom berlin was because she moved there. Thanks
by Mystere on 29 September 2009 - 21:09
Luvdogs,
Did you get a puppy from Victoria? Is that why you'd like to down-play the cheating and dyeing? What is the basis for your supposition (or wishful thinking?) that Victoria moved to Berlin?
Because, she did NOT change her kennel name "because she moved there." She is STILL IN OREGON! She changed her kennel name to distance herself and so people would not know it is the same now-infamous Gold-Berg kennels--that is obvious.
No, she did not move to Berlin. She's not far from where she was before. No, we are not talking about a one-time dyeing incident. If you read the thread, that should be clear. Why would you think that someone who has NO PROBLEM with publicly stating she dyes dogs would only do it once?
I am curious--it it were "only" one documented instance of dyeing a puppy and selling it based on the photo of the dyed puppy, would that somehow make you feel that there is no problem? How many instances would it take for you to consider it an indication?
You do have a puppy from her, don't you? My sympathies.
Did you get a puppy from Victoria? Is that why you'd like to down-play the cheating and dyeing? What is the basis for your supposition (or wishful thinking?) that Victoria moved to Berlin?
Because, she did NOT change her kennel name "because she moved there." She is STILL IN OREGON! She changed her kennel name to distance herself and so people would not know it is the same now-infamous Gold-Berg kennels--that is obvious. No, she did not move to Berlin. She's not far from where she was before. No, we are not talking about a one-time dyeing incident. If you read the thread, that should be clear. Why would you think that someone who has NO PROBLEM with publicly stating she dyes dogs would only do it once?
I am curious--it it were "only" one documented instance of dyeing a puppy and selling it based on the photo of the dyed puppy, would that somehow make you feel that there is no problem? How many instances would it take for you to consider it an indication?
You do have a puppy from her, don't you? My sympathies.
by luvdogs on 29 September 2009 - 21:09
No No, I am sorry I did not mean in any way to say that dying even one puppy was ok!! It is not! I just wanted to know if other things besides dying have been done -- like make sure the puppy has the right parents?? Right bloodlines? I do not mean to downplay that is not my intent at all. Berlin road in Lebanon oregon, not berlin berlin I am sorry like I said I did not know if she kept molalla kennel just that she lives in Lebanon.
by Mystere on 30 September 2009 - 13:09
BUMP, with the NASS coming up, this issue needs to remain in the forefront.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
