This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Slamdunc on 09 April 2011 - 20:04
I really consider you to be a very intelligent individual. I have a lot of respect for you based on the fact that I consider you to be intelligent and articulate. I can only assume you are joking or I am completely wrong about you and have given you way too much credit.
Jim
by darylehret on 09 April 2011 - 20:04
by troublelinx on 09 April 2011 - 20:04
by Slamdunc on 09 April 2011 - 21:04
You wrote:
Maybe if you started shooting fleeing suspects, there'd be fewer suspects attempting to flee, and getting totally away with it. If you feel you must play "chase", then save the tazer or pepperspray or nonlethal measures for the dogs that get in your way.
Shooting fleeing suspects? Really, that would go over well. Obviously, you are not serious. Playing "chase" is that what you call it? I don't play games when I'm working it is serious business and I do not consider it a game. Delivering mail and chasing fleeing often armed suspects are completely different lines of work. A mail man should be trained to deal with dogs, and cops should be trained to deal with violent fleeing felons.
I am prepared to deal with what happens when I go to work. I am heartbroken for the family whose dog was killed. I have been in similar situations and never shot anyone's dog. However, I am probably more skilled than most at reading dogs and dealing with aggressive dogs. At 2 AM it is hard to see the signs of a dog in a yard. like water dishes and piles of poop. I always rattle chain link fences before I go over them and listen. The family can sue if they feel the need to do that. Being a cop comes with a lot of responsibility and liability. The city will probably pay, if that helps to ease their suffering they should go for it.
I do not think you are an idiot, I think you are very intelligent and very well researched on several subjects. Go back and read what I wrote on the feasibility of alternative uses of force in this case.
Again, I feel sorry for the family and the dog. It was tragic for them. I realize that this is one of those very emotional topics and people have strong feelings regarding their pets, I know I do. No one wants to think this could happen to their dog. Since, I have been in similar situations; unlike most of those posting here I do have some insight. However, even with that insight I am not going to speculate on what happened because I wasn't there. It bugs me when people jump to conclusions and speculation with out all of the information. The only ones with all of the info are the ones that were there that night.
Jim
by Slamdunc on 09 April 2011 - 21:04
You have issues and they are really beginning to show. I find it fascinating.
Jim
by darylehret on 09 April 2011 - 21:04
A mail man should be trained to deal with dogs, and cops should be trained to deal with violent fleeing felons.
I'm afraid I must disagree. If you're subject to dogs in the line of duty, then you should be trained. Only desk jockeys shouldn't have to. There are so many dog shootings by LEO's each year, it's a disgrace. If you think even half of those are acceptable, then we oughta issue sidearms to all our postal employees as well, and save on training costs.
by Slamdunc on 09 April 2011 - 21:04
Perhaps you could provide a chart outlining the number of dogs shot by police each year, the number of dogs in this country and the number of officers working every day. Another chart could show the number of mail men bit and the number of cops bit by dogs. It is a rather infrequent occurrence that I come across dogs in yards, but it happens on occasion.
I also think it might be a bad idea to start arming postal workers, their reputation with firearms in the work place is not the greatest.
Jim
by troublelinx on 09 April 2011 - 21:04
by Nans gsd on 09 April 2011 - 22:04
by Slamdunc on 09 April 2011 - 23:04
It has it's moments both good and bad. Stressfull and rewarding often at the same time.
Jim
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top