Roach Back vs Straight Back - show - Page 6

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

pod

by pod on 30 March 2012 - 08:03

Ibraham, the video you posted of Gina.  I do agree that this is an improvement on many of the more exaggerated constructions we see on some GSDs but still, Gina to me is over done and far from ideal in movement.  

The topline is not excessively sloping or roached in movement by today's standard but if this degree had been present in a dog in the UK ring in the 80s, it would have been seen as too exaggerated.  It's the gradual progress into this type that has desensitised us to the serious movement faults that occur with this type of construction.  Yes we were getting long reach and drive back then but soundness was paramount in the ring.

If we compare Gina's movement with that of Dingo - first the forehand.  On Gina there is exaggerated lift of the foreleg, compensatory for the rear overangulation, producing overreach.  The hindquarters - hock walking on the forward step, sickle hock on the backward.  Excessive up and down movement of the croup.  Overall there is slackness seen mostly in flapping of the front pasterns.  All very different from the balanced stride and firmness of the more ecconomical gait of Dingo.

by Ibrahim on 30 March 2012 - 09:03

Pod,

I agree to a great extent, just I beg you take into account that this type of gaiting on leash does not do the dog justice, if she was gaiting freely she would look much better, but I agree with your analysis.

Ibrahim

Red Sable

by Red Sable on 30 March 2012 - 09:03

I liked your post Joseph, and agree. :)

Abby Normal

by Abby Normal on 30 March 2012 - 10:03

I am a little late commenting here Ibrahim on your post showing your dogs naturally and in stance. You know what I think of your dogs toplines - they are probably some of the best I have seen. You couldn't make them look roached no matter what stack you put them into LOL.

I agree with pod, we have become desensitised to certain faults along the path that the GSD has taken, and now accept them as just part of being a GSD. Here or on the other thread someone made a statement that we need to re-orient ourselves to what is 'normal', and that I think is very true.



by Ibrahim on 30 March 2012 - 11:03

Abby Normal,

You add richness to any thread you participate in and I usually agree more than I disagree with you.

Ibrahim

Von Savitch K9

by Von Savitch K9 on 30 March 2012 - 12:03

  
Ibrahim

My statement was not directed at you or your dogs I do not know you, I have made a general statment based on my knowalge of the breed and in respect to the purpose of its creation. This breed is special in many ways my hope is that all the folks involved here understand this and take very seriuosly there choices on mateing pairs and all the important carictoristics that make up the GSD. I would like to think we are all pulling the wagon in the same dirrection but what I see tells me otherwise.

Respectutfully

Von Savitch K9

by Blitzen on 30 March 2012 - 13:03

How long have you been in GSD's, V Savitch?


Von Savitch K9

by Von Savitch K9 on 30 March 2012 - 18:03

conservitivly 20 years I am 44 years old.

by Blitzen on 30 March 2012 - 18:03

I didn't see one dog on your website over 6 years of age. Have you started over?

BTW, isn't that a showline in your avatar?

by joanro on 30 March 2012 - 18:03

Seems like all this back and forth-- show line vs working line and all this distaste/hatred of one camp for the other, could be resolved and ended by doing the logical thing; declare them TWO DISTINCT BREEDS. And every one can leave each to his/her own ideal to make better or worse what remains of a breed in trouble.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top