This is a placeholder text
Group text
by jaymesie51 on 23 March 2010 - 19:03
Preaching to the converted will get us nowhere what we need is for the GSDP to take all the evidence and go to the press with it, surely that is better than doing nothing, the KC will go to the media to slate our breed so lets get in before them this time, its about time the GSDP did something as so far they have got nowhere with the KC so play them at there own game but get in first
jim h
jim h
by Sue B on 24 March 2010 - 10:03
Hey guys, another of my observations in the KC;s recent Statement that it seems no-one has yet picked up on. Why have they have now chosen to say:- "... only those which sign will be allocated CCs from 2011 onwards.' as opposed to the original statement and basis of compliance within the Undertaking, that CC allocation effected will be from 2012???
Another KC cock up do you think or perhaps a slip of tongue? Are the KC intending to remain True to Form by yet again changing the Goal Posts to suit their needs half way through the game?
Are they now saying Licences for 2011 wont be granted if you dont sign, I can see big expence claims dropping on the KC mat if this is the case, including loss of venue reservation money and law suits for breach of contract from judges.
Once again we need to be constantly vigilant by both reading and fully understanding the varied implications each new statement reveals. With the KC it aint enough to just read what it at face value, more often than not one has to take it apart sentance by sentance to read what it really says.
Something else again the KC now need to Re- Clarify.
Regards
Sue b
.
Another KC cock up do you think or perhaps a slip of tongue? Are the KC intending to remain True to Form by yet again changing the Goal Posts to suit their needs half way through the game?
Are they now saying Licences for 2011 wont be granted if you dont sign, I can see big expence claims dropping on the KC mat if this is the case, including loss of venue reservation money and law suits for breach of contract from judges.
Once again we need to be constantly vigilant by both reading and fully understanding the varied implications each new statement reveals. With the KC it aint enough to just read what it at face value, more often than not one has to take it apart sentance by sentance to read what it really says.
Something else again the KC now need to Re- Clarify.
Regards
Sue b
.
by Sue B on 24 March 2010 - 11:03
bumping
by noddi on 24 March 2010 - 12:03
Sue,i came to the same conclusion when i read the kc statement.meant to reply and point it out but my laptop locked and i had to wait for a fully charged laptop to run down.didnt remember this till i,ve just read your post.METHINKS THE KC ARE MOVING THE GOALPOSTS YET AGAIN.oh you clubs that have signed,WATCH YOUR BACKS IS ALL I CAN SAY.YOU HAVE SIGNED YOUR FREEDOM AWAY.Carole S.
by bazza on 25 March 2010 - 20:03
bump
by bazza on 28 March 2010 - 15:03
bump
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
