This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Jenni78 on 08 March 2011 - 20:03
Jackie, email me or call me. Number's on the website. Those dogs ARE NOT HERS!!! Not only that, but a few are just about the last of certain bloodlines and I'd really hate for them to end up PTS due to being deemed unadoptable.
ANYONE WHO KNOWS WHAT OTHER DOGS WERE THERE AND WHO ELSE OWNS DOGS THAT JANICE CONNED INTO "LENDING" TO HER FOR HER "NON-PROFIT PROGRAM" PLEASE EMAIL ME ASAP.
by Donald Deluxe on 08 March 2011 - 20:03
by Keith Grossman on 08 March 2011 - 20:03
by VomMarischal on 08 March 2011 - 20:03
Keith, they lost anybody who was worth one cent. Anybody with any ethics.
by Rugers Guru on 08 March 2011 - 20:03
The original threads about Bartmess were very important to this website, those that were deleted may have saved some poor dogs life or health had the owners been able to research her here before handing their dog over to this monster.
by Donald Deluxe on 08 March 2011 - 20:03
A bunch, Keith, a bunch, although I think it's fair to say that certain posters with personal issues in league with the animal abuser needlessly complicated things by trying to misdirect Oli to take action against other members.
But I'm encouraged by what I'm seeing here today - perhaps some good can come out of this story after all.
by Donald Deluxe on 08 March 2011 - 20:03
With that in mind, I'd suggest that MY character and discretion is not the issue here. Not one bit.
by Betty on 08 March 2011 - 20:03
And if they knew of her history and either didn't care or thought she was reformed. Shame. Give someone a second chance when you are the only one that stands to lose something, don't have a dog pay the price for your "good deed."
If that sounds harsh I'm sorry. between the dogs starved in Penn and now this I am sick.
by Sock Puppet on 08 March 2011 - 21:03
In my mind that makes you just as guilty.
by Donald Deluxe on 08 March 2011 - 21:03
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top