Breeder Rights? Breeder Greed? - Page 22

Because the person (RIP) signed the freak'n contract!  That is why Molly wants the option to take the dogs back because she doesn't know the friends who took the dogs. 

Are you naive enough to think the dogs would not be put into a kennel?

It's obvious you've never been to Molly's. 

    No, I did not take up the invitations when I lived 7 years less than 20 mins from her place. I look at the way eagle looked after he could do not more for the kennel and base it on his missing ear piece and unbrushed and poor hair conditioned coat. He was not house kept why would these dogs be?

     My only point is I would not send them for round two profit sitting in a kennel.

Brandi, the point you are missing, is that the contract was not binding to the estate.  Very important detail.


And secondly I have been on both ends of contracts with the clause of first refusal.  I have no problem with that, it does not mean the person with the right has the right to get the dog or property for free, merely the chance to meet or beat an offer on the table or offer full market value depending on how it is worded.

If something happened to me there would be way to many dogs for my husband.  One of the dogs would be returned to the breeder, that is something my husband, myself and the breeder have discussed.  She would finish her life where she started it.  He would also assist my husband in placing any of the younger dogs that my husband felt was too much for him.

And out of curiousity did my post offend you?  Your response seemed kind of snippy, I swear I could see your eye's rolling.... <grin>

> I look at the way eagle looked after he could do not more for the kennel and base it on his missing ear piece and unbrushed and poor hair conditioned coat. He was not house kept why would these dogs be? <

Only going to respond to the misinformation and supposition here. Eagle had an ear hematoma (like cauliflower ear in humans) well before he was an aged dog. Despite attempts to have the ear cartilege heal cleanly, the healing process caused the cartilege in the ear to wrinkle and fold. I know this because I helped with some of the aftercare during this process. He spent his last years in the house as a much-beloved companion and house dog--pretty much never crated or kenneled (and not much kenneled and crated as a young dog, either--he was always a housedog).

And as far as looking unbrushed... you ever had an old GSD with lots of coat? My 13 year old prepared for an arctic summer and is now blowing coat *again* (about the 4th time this year... and yes, I did bloodwork and all comes back normal!) -- she's the fuzziest old girl right now. It's not due to lack of care or love or attention or grooming (OK, I could probably brush her every day, although she might object)--it's how old dog coats get sometimes--they don't always shed normally and they seem to pick their own random schedules for deciding to grow winter coats. Oh, and she has a folded ear, too, from a hematoma when she was 8 or so.

Christine

Betty,
Not being snippy, just in mere discussion.
I'm not missing the point.  I understand that once the person who signed the contract passed away, the contract is void. I only chimed in with all my posts because I was being asked questions.
The contract being void due to persons death had only been brought up a few times, then turned right back to the contract itself then to the care of Molly's dogs, etc., then on to her kennels, then on to poor Eagle (RIP).
Where the heck had I ever mentioned Eagle....not sure where Eagle came up in all of it other than GSDNewbie not having anything better to discuss.  Like, dang, is that all you got?
Oh, and I was there too when Eagle had his ear hematoma.  So I will third that. (Some need to get there facts straight)...rumors rumors rumors.  At least our world is still going around and around and around....

I have an old gsd with tons of coat, he is kept immaculate and inside my home. I was referring to a separate ear incident. The point is she appoints herself as the judge and jury of how all dogs should be cared for and I personally do not think hers get enough care. I could be wrong and am going by small amounts of information and photos submitted not by herself. Could she be judging these people wrong? Who says she is the ultimate person to be able to pick homes for dogs she sold away. These dogs have not seen her and do not know her. She bad mouths the friends yet says she knows nothing about them. You can't have it both ways.

     I have four indoor dogs. they are brushed every single day. They have glossy coats. They have zero old dead dull hair and clumps. Their bowls are scubbed and bleached daily. Their blankets are changed daily. I have not gone back to find the photos to show what I am talking about but when I saw them I was appaled at his appearance. I can present my dogs for inspection at any moment so perhaps I am just that particular in their care but then I love them very much and I do not keep more than I can provide that exact care for each and every day. If she cant keep dogs well enough, she doesnt need more sitting around she does not have that time for. I know others saw what I am talking about because it has been discussed.

  Quick snapshot of my 9 year old who spends these days as a house pet. Groomed, nails perfect, ears cleaned and in excellent health and looks. This is how a dog is supposed to be kept if someone wants to pick at others claiming they need to take dogs away from them.

 

Awesome!

GSDNewbie,
Very handsome boy....but your point is?
Every dog is different.  Every dog's coat is different.  Example, I have two Corgis from the same parents but different litters who have completely different coat types.  Like night and day.  One's coat is silky shiny and "tight", while the others is thick and dence, as if I never groom him (but as a former professional dog groomer, that is not true). 
So, besides you posting a photo of your handsome fella, your coat photo to prove your point makes no sence, but good try.