WDA'S REDICULOUS QUALIFICATION PLAN! - Page 5

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 07 May 2013 - 04:05

Wallace started this thread as an all capitals misspelled rant about the WDA.  Wallace does not care about the integrity of the sport as much as he is complaining about having to compete with more GSDCA-WDA handler/dog teams than he wants to compete with for the WUSV team spots.  As usual the USCA wants to exclude as many people as possible that are not USCA members from any competition.   Spare me from the integrity of the USCA as the organization has none.

by Gustav on 07 May 2013 - 08:05

Folks, stay onpoint and ignore posts that want to bring in USA....this post was about what the WDA is or should be doing....feeding the USA component is not the issue. Thx....nobody wants to hear yesterday's news!

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 07 May 2013 - 09:05

Read the original post, Wallace is whining because he will have to compete against 10 and not seven from the GSDCA-WDA at the WUSV combined qualifier for the WUSV 2013 USA team.  The USCA goal is to compete against 0 from any other organization.  The USCA is always about excluding others and being the only game in town.  At least one of the GSDCA-WDA's best competitors was not in the GSDCA-WDA competition because of an injury.  If the WUSV says that the GSDCA-WDA can send 10 participants of their choosing to the qualifier then that is the law because it is the WUSV's event and not the USCA's.  The USCA still thinks they are driving the bus when they are just a passenger like all the rest of the WUSV member organizations.

by SitasMom on 07 May 2013 - 10:05

"LAST BUT NOT LEAST YOU DON'T KNOW ME AND WHAT KIND OF SPORTSMAN I AM OR NOT!  IF YOU KNEW ME,  YOU WOULD HAVE KNOWN I HAVE ALREADY SHOWN SPORTSMANSHIP BY WITHDRAWING MY INTENTION TO COMPETE FOR THE  QUALI TRIAL.   LIKE I SAID I HAVE SOME PRIDE,  AND I DIDN'T WANT TO BE CONSIDERED AFTER NOT GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS..."



http://wdanational.net/2013/competitors_results.htm

I dont see Wallace Payne's name on the 2013 results list........

In 2012 he was 4th.
 

by wplumb on 07 May 2013 - 10:05

Wallace had a 284 at the Working Dog and is entered in the AWDF. USCA has three National Events.

WUSV did not set the qualification rules, they just said there had to be a joint event and the results at that event would select the team for the WUSV. USCA and GSDCA/WDA negotiated the rules for how each the participants would be selected. The agreed to rules were each could send up to ten and they had to have a score of 270 or higher at a National Event with in the last year. I d not know why USCA decided to let WDA send teams to the Joint Qualifier that did not get a 270 at the WDA Nationals, however it may have been because GSDCA is hosting the WUSV this year. I think it shows good sportmenship by USCA.

by Gustav on 07 May 2013 - 10:05

Thanks for relevant facts, Bill!

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 07 May 2013 - 10:05

Apparently you USCA guys are just slow learners.  The WUSV is in charge of the WUSV and all associated competitions.  There are no arrows on the WUSV organization chart between the USCA and the GSDCA or GSDCA-WDA.  It does not matter in the least what the USCA agrees to or does not agree to.  Whatever Wallace does is up to Wallace and the USCA and whatever the GSDCA-WDA does is up to the GSDCA and the GSDCA-WDA.  Sounds like Wallace and the USCA are the ones with the third grade mentality .. "if you don't play by my rules then I won't play".   If the USCA WUSV competitors get all of the spots for the WUSV 2013 USA team you won't hear a peep out of the GSDCA-WDA because the SV judges at the WUSV qualifier will be fair and unbiased.  As usual the USCA has made up their own rules for a WUSV event and those rules give the USCA the advantage.  The GSDCA-WDA follows the WUSV constitution and rules and if those rules allow them to send 10 teams to the qualifier then that is what they will do. The GSDCA and GSDCA-WDA do not make deals or agreements with the USCA to get what is due to them as WUSV members.

Mystere

by Mystere on 07 May 2013 - 11:05

Booboo: your rants indicate low blood sugar. Try eating sone Hard Kandee [sic] and maybe you will be able to comprehend that the agreement regarding the Selection Trial is between USCA & WDA. WUSV is not a party to it. WDA is not living up to its agreement. Personally, I could care less, as it is (1) typical and (2) just means that the Team will most likely be entirely comprised of USCA members. :

 I don't recall ever seeing your kennel name in any trial results, and from your post above, you don't trial or title. So, obviously the WUSV/SV rules don't matter all that much to you.

by gsdstudent on 07 May 2013 - 11:05

some people are like some dogs, they like to make conflict where it is not necessary. The way to handle that dog is to be consistent and make only one set of rules. The way to handle people who love conflict is to buy them a computor, and let them think they have a message. It keeps them busy and not creating any real problems, your turn bubba, let me help you start your favorite debate. I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I?

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 07 May 2013 - 11:05

The GSDCA-WDA does not need an agreement with the USCA to pick their ten teams for the qualifier as I understand the WUSV rules.  If the GSDCA-WDA wants to pick their team by pulling names from a hat that is the GSDCA-WDA's choice.  The USCA is not in a position to tell any other WUSV member club what they can or can't do as the USCA is an insignificant and small player in the WUSV.  As I said before Mystere if you pull my finger I will express how much I care what you think, want or say.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top