This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Mystere on 01 April 2009 - 17:04
It is a matter of principle. Some of us have more issues with blatant mendacity than others. Some just like to be mendacious and have run into a few people who will call them on it ...every time.
by 4pack on 01 April 2009 - 22:04
by sdowden on 02 April 2009 - 17:04
by TessJ10 on 02 April 2009 - 18:04
"Hey, do you think Tess knows how to read? I didn't add that dog to the database. I've stated so twice already.
And if it isn't a AKC title, then it would be an ISSR title, not the one Tess listed.
Olie must have upgraded the pedigree function. In the past, I tried correcting a ped. where I added the DOB in the title section by accident, and I was unable to remove it."
I read a lot better than you. Pay attention. I never said you entered the dog. I asked, REPEATEDLY, to know what that CV CH title is. LOL, there's NO DOUBT, as I did state (but perhaps you cannot read, in addition to apparently being computer illiterate ), that if it is supposed to be GV, then it's definitely from the Shiloh registry and not an SV or USA or WDA or any other legitimate working dog organization title. I apparently read a lot better than you. And I repeat, for you to (which you admit) be editing and adding info to mixed breed dogs on a GSD database is reprehensible. You are now in the position of taking info on mixed breeds on the db and saying, well, I'm sure that's not their real title, they're probably really a Grand Victor - when even the owner of the dog didn't list claim it to be a GV.
P.S. Thanks, Mystere. You definitely get it!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top