Earliest roach or BANANA-back in PDB...??? - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by marci on 07 February 2008 - 23:02

Chance to encounter this bitch in URMA 1986... Outlining all the VA-dogs  Zwinger Wienerau and Arminius had produced in the past...  

Roulette von der Wienerau ...... This other LADY is missing data...  

Delfy von Schaffhausen ..... was there any cross-breeding done to make that ARCHED-BACK...????

http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/bulletins_read/166919.html#167129

 


Silbersee

by Silbersee on 08 February 2008 - 01:02

I did not know that there was an URMA 1986! Mine start in the year 1994. Maybe, I missed something? Could you clarify? In his foreword, Urban Pettersson also stated that this is his first book.

As to the newest thread about this nonsense with banana-backs, I have nothing more to say about that. I have tried to explain this in the topic I started about toplines. You might want to read it? Just put "toplines" into the search area. It is getting so tiresome, but I am sure there will be people happy to contribute.


by marci on 08 February 2008 - 01:02

I'm sorry... my mistake... It was URMA 1996 when Visum was Sieger.... there was a Tribute to the Martin brothers who just passed away... that year I think...


SchHBabe

by SchHBabe on 08 February 2008 - 05:02

Before digging deeper you might want to further clarify what you consider a banana back.  I'm sure you'd get different definitions depending on if you ask the show crowd or the working crowd.  LOL.

For example, is this what you would call a banana back...?

Or this...?

Or this...?

Or do you dismiss all of the above as "just a bad stack"?

 


by Deal With It on 08 February 2008 - 20:02

Ok. Someone answer me this.  Why would anyone breed to get a back like the ones above? What is the purpose of the "roach back?" 

In my opinion, those are some REALLY bad looking dogs!

The angled, straight back is SOOOO much more attractive, regal looking and I would think a lot less stress on the backbone.

But, just my opinion.

 


the Ol'Line Rebel

by the Ol'Line Rebel on 08 February 2008 - 20:02

There must be ALOT of bad handling in German shows!  They just don't know how to stack!   ;-)

Yes, they look bad, but those roach-backed GS must be really great gallopers - at least for their weight and build.

Sorry, I've never seen a dog outside GS that has a roach that wasn't meant for being able to RUN like the wind (not trot).  They're sighthounds as a rule, and greyhounds specifically.


senta

by senta on 08 February 2008 - 21:02

I think for placing, who am only reason - with normal GSD -, the dogs in such a way for a photo that the body form is comparable. I know dogs, which are really in the back very much, very deep - a special feature in the 80's. Today that is not any longer favored, thinks I. My dogs have degrees a back - however if I pull to them in the back "the legs long", fall the back in the back off - that is a thing of the photo - and how long I will pull the legs long in the back and it presses down ( for each dog easy to learn )..... If they run normally and move, the back part has a normal height. Photos can lie very well ; -) There are many, very many bad photos of GSD - in the database too - and if the dogs of these photos move normally, they are not as deep in the back as in the photos - separates completely normally. Please have a look to one ad where the dogs stand normally - I mean ONLY the pic: http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/classifieds/51861.html. I can put both dogs in such a way that the back part falls "down there". I hate the discussion about "banana-back".

by marci on 10 February 2008 - 21:02

I'm sorry if you got me wrong guys... I was searching for the lines that shaped the modern-back of the VA-line dogs... Historically the GSDs backs  are long with a very high and prominent  WITHER ( I remember being a child seing one of the old type of GSD and thinking that the prominent wither is because the GSD was part of the working-group e.g. Dobes, Rotts. then as opposed to the herding group now...) some of the DDR dogs (not the bulky-ones)  and most of the high-drive Working-line GSDs maintained the prominent withers and somewhat longer backs (SOME even have NICKS at the withers) which I'm thinking is a sign that,  these dogs bloodlines USED TO HAVE Prominent withers... Now getting back to the ARCHED back ( lets not call it BANANA's) the very noticeable break in the topline making the back really SHORT nad making the Croup-line (top of the loins going to the pelvis) LONGER... This according to history was done as an OVER -COMPENSATION to the long-backs the R-LITTER contributed to the bloodlines after WW2....  My Question was "What Bloodlines were used to make the BACK SHORT..???" Alf Nordfelsen and who else...??? Follow-up question is how do you breed for prominent withers..?? I not refering to the HIGH withers that are due to the lack of angulation on the shoulder assembly... I refering to REAL WORKING Withers...






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top