This is a placeholder text
Group text
by jaggirl47 on 12 September 2012 - 15:09
Do you test your dogs to see if the are JRD carriers? Why or why not? Here is the link to the company that does these tests:
www.dogenes.com.
*Disclaimer*
This is only because of my interest in genetics. This has nothing to do with myself or my dogs.
by Videx on 12 September 2012 - 18:09
by Hundmutter on 12 September 2012 - 20:09
by jaggirl47 on 12 September 2012 - 20:09
I have an aquaintance that lost his pup at 9 months to this same disease. I also remember all too well last year when another GSD owner was looking for a kidney for their pup with this.
I do have to agree with you Videx. When a breeder tests for something, or even produces something, and chooses not to hide it, they do become ridiculed and lose business. I don't think this is right. I would rather have a breeder tell me what their dogs carry or have produced instead of a breeder that does not test or tries to hide something. Pups end up getting sold with these unknown illnesses because of this.
I also hear frequently, "This DNA test isn't trustworthy". Why isn't it trustworthy? It is testing the dogs actual DNA. Is it not trustworthy because you just do not want to waste your time or is it that you just truly do not want to know? How can it harm the breeding operation if you actually test your dogs so as not to produce something?
by B.Andersen on 12 September 2012 - 21:09
by jaggirl47 on 12 September 2012 - 21:09
For those that would like to know, it is passed as dominant with incomplete penetrance and only takes 1 parent to pass it on.
by B.Andersen on 12 September 2012 - 22:09
by jaggirl47 on 13 September 2012 - 14:09
by Abby Normal on 13 September 2012 - 23:09
How do the breed clubs determine what is a 'problem' within the breed? I personally find the GSD BC very lax in terms of health initiatives. At the moment I doubt the breed club for the GSD would put forward JRD. Any more than it would PD or perhaps even DM. Are you testing for those now Videx? Still very few in the UK seem to be, despite tests being available and a known problem in the breed.
IMO tests should be compulsory and the results published purely to get an accurate reflection of how great a problem or not specific conditions are within a breed so that strategies can be devised if necessary.
by jaggirl47 on 14 September 2012 - 04:09
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top