This is a placeholder text
Group text
by dinura on 18 July 2011 - 15:07
for last minute entries please e-mail carole lister at thomasmonds@aol.co.uk
WUSV rules and regulations
judges SV Peter Arth
UK Paul Bradley
by Videx on 18 July 2011 - 21:07
It can be a long Journey to watch a few dogs!
by Penny on 18 July 2011 - 22:07
What about entering too David, we miss you at these Regionals. Mo
by Videx on 19 July 2011 - 11:07
One thing that has happened this year, because of the negatives, they have actually heightened the appeal of the Kennel Club Championship shows. I see no reason to doubt that this will continue.
The Sieger Show 2011 is also clearly suffering from similar negatives creeping in. Such as off lead gaiting for the Adult Classes, which most obviously has not been carefully thought through. Then there is the quite ridiculous inclusion of Long Coat Classes being in the same ring and apparently being 'slotted in between normal coat classes, simply ridiculous and frustrating to many exhibitors and spectators who have little or no interest.
The Long Coat Classes should be in a separate ring with a separate Judge(s). With the track record of the Group so far I fully anticipate they will NOT see the obvious logic in my concerns. I also have MAJOR concerns regarding the Breed Survey and health requirements for Long Coats following the debacle at the recent Regional Event which was so easily avoidable. It is apparent that little or no thought has been given to fairness, consistency and equality for this 'breed'.
I now have to accept that the current 'leaders' have confusing and limited experience in the introduction and development of a show system, and appear to cobble together changes, additions and developments with whimsical forethought and from selective opinions without very carefully thinking every detail though. I see no early change in this behavior and therefore more negatives creeping in, which will easily smother any positives very quickly.
I have very little hope that things will change for the better some time soon, therefore I will observe the negatives increasing and the positives diminishing, and therefore I can only observe the glow of a great opportunity for our breed here within the UK grow dimmer and dimmer.
by Penny on 19 July 2011 - 12:07
We just all have to keep our heads to the fact that it is a new innovation that is being started in the UK - that there are bound to be teething troubles, like anything new - and that these issues are ironed out as they occur. It would be great to have the forethought to put all to rights before it has begun, but sometimes, in the testing of a new start, things have to be tried and matters addressed as they go along.
I am sure that you have some valid points to put across David, and some very valid dialogue has passed around everyone this morning regarding off lead gaiting for the adult classes, without it having to go to the lengths of negativity. There have been frustrations, there have been things that could have been done differently, and no doubt in the future will be, but if we only sit at home and criticise - then, those that are out there hoping to build a new future for the UK exhibition of GSD`s may also begin to feel negatives about the work that is being done to get things going along. Mo
by noddi on 19 July 2011 - 12:07
by Abby Normal on 19 July 2011 - 18:07
I wonder what the reasoning is behind introducing off lead gaiting in all adult classes? Is it a requirement of the WUSV? I suppose that if it is to be a 'Sieger' show in the truest sense, off lead gaiting should be a standard feature, but I am curious as to why it has been introduced, and who had input to that decision.
One thought that I haven't (until now) been inclined to air publicly, lest I am torn limb from limb, is that it may just be that fewer people than expected (in the scheme of things) actually like showing the 'German' way. It could be as simple as that. I am sure all support the idea that every dog is fully health tested, but beyond that it does not necessarily appeal to a lot of small exhibitors, especially if you have to have a handler because you can't do the gaiting rounds yourself and can't afford a handler etc. It's a style of showing that does not lend itself to handling your own dog, which a lot of people gain immense satisfaction from. JMO.
by Lennard on 19 July 2011 - 20:07
by Videx on 19 July 2011 - 20:07
Negatives are occurring which are completely avoidable by adopting some basic fundamentals on the committees responsible for the Events.
One of those basic fundamentals is exactly what 'Abby Normal' has stated in her post above, namely: "I am sure all support the idea that every dog is fully health tested, but beyond that it does not necessarily appeal to a lot of small exhibitors" I would prefer the word 'small' to be deleted.
Another is the importance of an EVENT CHECK LIST for each Events organisers which sets out IMPORTANT FUNDAMENTALS WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO AN EVENTS SUCCESS.
It is simply not good enough for an event organiser to answer "WE NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT THAT" when asked by an exhibitor "why aren't there any hides in the provided 'outside attraction area'?"
Everybody who sits on an EVENT committee should CLEARLY understand that they are NOT there to make spontaneous decisions or suggestions which may have ANY impact on the EVENTS.
IDEAS TO INTRODUCE ANY CHANGES OR ADDITIONS MUST BE VERY CAREFULLY THOUGHT THROUGH, ALWAYS REMEMBERING "IF IT AIN'T BUST DON'T FIX IT".
by Blerio on 19 July 2011 - 22:07
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top