This is a placeholder text
Group text
by bubbabooboo on 10 May 2013 - 12:05
by troopscott on 10 May 2013 - 12:05
by beetree on 10 May 2013 - 12:05
by susie on 10 May 2013 - 12:05
Personal answer to Bob: I´m neither naive nor retarded, I absolutely know what´s going on in " the world of the German Shepherd "....
We are talking about the US right now, and I am talking about all the Americans that aren´t even able or willing to pass " the lowered requirements ", doesn´t make sense, does it ????
If training and titling is THAT EASY, why don´t people do it?
There are always excuses:
- Lack of time
- Lack of money
- Not necessary
- No club
In reality people are neither interested in training nor willing to learn anything about this wonderful breed,
As I said before, once again for all of you : THERE ARE GREAT DOGS IN THE UNITED STATES, TRAIN, TITLE, AND SHOW THEM!
by Bob McKown on 10 May 2013 - 13:05
Quote
"In reality people are neither interested in training nor willing to learn anything about this wonderful breed,"
Your so wrong about that it,s astounding!
by susie on 10 May 2013 - 13:05
How much percent of the American breeders do care about health, temperament or standard?
If I´m right, the German Shepherd and the Golden Retriever are the most sold breeds within the United States.
Some weeks ago I asked on this forum how many members there are within the US sport and breed clubs - the answer was depressing, compared to the total amount of German Shepherds...
I do have a handful of wonderful American friends, training and titling their dogs, I have been visiting the States on a regular basis from 1987 to 2007, I´d be glad if you proof me wrong!
by OGBS on 10 May 2013 - 13:05
The "They are better" sentence was put in quotes to illustrate a point that is too rampant in this country.
This is not what I believe personally.
I believe we have great dogs here in the U.S.
As to the point of the breeding seminars. You are all correct. We do not have enough or any of these in the U.S.
The last breeding seminar I remember hearing about was Carmen Battaglia going to the Hunt Corp to teach puppy mills how to produce more puppies.
This is a failure of all of the organizations. The national breed clubs, the akc, etc.
UScA has regional breed wardens and a national breed warden. I wish the people in those positions took their designations more seriously.
It isn't (or shouldn't be) an honorary position. If this was set up properly these should be some of the most important people in any breed club/organization.
(BubbaBooBoo, Thanks for starting this thread. It is an excellent topic.)
by bubbabooboo on 10 May 2013 - 14:05
Here are the AKC’s top 25 U.S. breeds for 2012:
- Labrador Retriever
- German Shepherd Dog
- Golden Retriever
- Beagle
- Bulldog
- Yorkshire Terrier
- Boxer
- Poodle
- Rottweiler
- Dachshund
- Shih Tzu
- Doberman Pinscher
- Miniature Schnauzer
- French Bulldog
- German Shorthaired Pointer
- Siberian Husky
- Great Dane
- Chihuahua
- Pomeranian
- Cavalier King Charles Spaniel
- Shetland Sheepdog
- Australian Shepherd
- Boston Terrier
- Permbroke Welsh Corgi
- Maltese
by Gigante on 10 May 2013 - 14:05
If its a trophy and a title thing, then the argument perhaps has merit. If the breed is a working breed and more working dogs are employed here than anywhere else and are in fact, from breedings, from here, then it would seem your opinion is flawed. Again I cant find the numbers. If so, then, that boils it down to me as, titles and sport are the goal, and not work and utility. The same ole argument just with a twist.
I'm sure there are plenty of scout, guide dogs, scent detection, cadaver, explosive, sar & k9 handlers etc... that would read this thread and go uh huh lets see your world class dog do this everyday. Not poo pooing sport and titles just not forgetting the paw's on the street.
World class..... tomato.. tamato.
by Bob McKown on 10 May 2013 - 14:05
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top