Was 2011 a good Sieger Show or a Bad Sieger Show? - Page 5

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Mackenzie on 11 September 2011 - 07:09

I am aware that a few show people in the UK have used Neck v d Wolfen, whose name I picked out of the air from remembering a photo that I had seen when he first came to the UK. He seemed to me to be an ideal example to promote the idea of looking to the working dogs to improve the character and workability of our breed. There are other Neck’s out there and available at stud. I am also aware that, not just in the UK but worldwide, breeders will see this as a retrograde step but sometimes we have to step back in order to come forward.

It is fair to note that the majority of breeders worldwide have never trained a dog beyond the needs of the showring. It is, therefore, no surprise to me that with none, or very little, training experience there is little appreciation of the true worth in assessing our dogs temperaments. The adequate training of our dogs gives us the insight to the strengths and weakness’s of the animals together with the enormous satisfaction in being able to bond and properly control them in all conditions. It makes for a complete dog and enhances our own individual status.

It is also clear from this thread, which has been conducted so far in a polite and meaningful way, that the show breeders have contributed very little in an informative way to improve the current faults that we see today. As I see it, unless these people do contribute, no real progress will be made towards improvement and, we must remember that this group worldwide produce the majority of dogs in the world.

Mackenzie

 

Abby Normal

by Abby Normal on 11 September 2011 - 11:09

It's a big subject, and both sides have indicated quite vehemently that one line should not be 'sullied' by the other, since both perceive that they have the correct dog now. 

To break it down to a smaller question - do either show or working breeders acknowledge what you refer to as 'current faults' ? 

The showing system (in Germany esp) does not seem to allow for any type of dog outside the current mould to progress. Therefore, if some breeders are incorporating some mix of SL/WL - where do they go to show off that dog, and what happens when they do?  The opportunity for a firm change of direction which could be introduced by the SV historically (Klodo an obvious example) appears to have been lost, since there are no alternatives to the type.

At least that is how I understand it, but I am willing to be educated in the finer points of the SV & the Sieger and it's ability/desire to influence.  On a personal level I mourn the lack of even a little variety in type today.



by Mackenzie on 11 September 2011 - 13:09

It is accepted that there is a big difference between many of the working dogs and show dogs in their appearance. Colour being the obvious difference since Hermann Martin decided that grey was no longer acceptable. There was never any satisfactory explanation, as far as I know, as why that should be. However there are more working dogs who are anatomically very good and, certainly good enough to be used in a mating, if breeders take the trouble to look. Also, and importantly, there are many showline dogs used in the breeding programme which carry many serious faults but this is overlooked by the showline breeders e.g. size, character, unsoundness and epilepsy. The working people are also guilty of this regarding size and soundness to some degree but the character and work ethic for this section takes preference over breeding to the standard, and therefore, it is understandable why the show dogs are not considered for their matings because of character and workability weakness‘s. It is interesting to note that so many working dogs are grey, bi-colour and black.

The whole world follows Germany but they are experiencing the same difficulties. They may be seeking alternatives but the inbreed that has taken place over the last thirty years cannot be reversed overnight. Also, there is the commercial side that has surfaced and this is holding back any meaningful change. Someone, somewhere has to bite the bullet and extend their breeding programme to search for the alternative breeding families. I think that there is a need to understand the breeding families more and, how they come together, rather that keep using the next top dogs who are producing more of the same.

Mackenzie

 

Irina Kuznetsova

by Irina Kuznetsova on 11 September 2011 - 14:09

Here it is another link to our second video from SV BSZS-2011 with protection service of V1-V20 (14 out of) males.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koSX4tPKuQY



by Mackenzie on 11 September 2011 - 14:09

Irina I have seen and enjoyed your videos in the past and those that I have seen this year, however, would you please advertise them on your own thread or elswhere as they have nothing to do with this thread.  The result is that it is detracting from the subject matter here.

Many thanks

Mackenzie




Irina Kuznetsova

by Irina Kuznetsova on 11 September 2011 - 15:09

O'k!

by Mackenzie on 11 September 2011 - 15:09

Thankyou Irina, I appreciate your co-operation.

Many thanks

Mackenzie




Abby Normal

by Abby Normal on 11 September 2011 - 17:09

Mackenzie
I totally agree. I also know there are breeders in the UK who are biting the bullet and carrying out some interesting SL/WL crosses. I have no idea to what degree, if at all, that is happening in Germany.

My question remains however. If a magificent dog is born from SL/WL how can they showcase the attributes of that dog? It would no doubt be considered a pariah by both sides. There are undoubtedly some magnificent working dogs available, but yes, the colours are all wrong for SL. I can only guess that Hermann Martin simply did not like grey dogs. I would love to see some good blacks in the mix. 

My understanding of the Sieger show, the judging system and it's influence on breeding is that it is encouraging an endless loop of more of the same. Every year the VA and V dogs are highly sought after to include in breedings, and this was always the achilles heel of the Sieger show, and was even recognised as such by Germany. The youngsters produced from these breedings are the V's and VA's 'in waiting' of tomorrow and so it goes on. Almost anyone can predict the VA and V placings from year to year. The pace of change if it is being sought will be slow indeed under the current system.

The whole world follows Germany. Exactly. So the change needs to come from the SV, but politics, commercial interests and the system itself seem to me to be working against it, despite the fact that Germany acknowledge some problems.

by Mark3 on 12 September 2011 - 13:09

Ab Nor, There’s a Neck v d Wolfen son bred by Mascani doing pretty well in the show ring in Ireland. 

 


Abby Normal

by Abby Normal on 12 September 2011 - 13:09

Mark3
Thanks for that information, I didn't know that. 

I knew that Mascani had produced a Neck v. d Wolfen litter. It is hugely encouraging that a SLXWL can do well in the conformation ring at least in UK/Ireland. Perhaps if you wouldn't mind could you PM me details, as I would love to find out more. Thanks





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top