This is a placeholder text
Group text
by dantes on 22 January 2013 - 22:01
Only picture 13 looked like a GSD to me. It was pretty obvious that none of the others were.
by guddu on 22 January 2013 - 23:01
But remember these are medium to high content mixes, for low content F5 or F6 gen it could be impossible to pick up say 1% wolf.
by dantes on 23 January 2013 - 11:01
Agreed
by Hundmutter on 23 January 2013 - 13:01
Y'know, apart from being off the original topic, this whole wolf-hybrid
debate is pretty daft anyway. Apart from echoing what was said about
Von Stephanitz's take on the subject, recent scientific research thinking
is that the northern TIMBER wolf is not the ancestor of the branch that
became the domestic dog in any case. That honour going to one of the
north african or middle & near East species, in all probability.
So with grey wolves you are not actually getting 'back' to anything; you're
just proving yet again how malleable the Canids genetics are.
All those with husky/eskimo dogs/malamutes/gsds etc have actually been
doing is starting a new, and less adaptable, type of hybrid, since they all
seem to use northern wolves in their experiments ...
debate is pretty daft anyway. Apart from echoing what was said about
Von Stephanitz's take on the subject, recent scientific research thinking
is that the northern TIMBER wolf is not the ancestor of the branch that
became the domestic dog in any case. That honour going to one of the
north african or middle & near East species, in all probability.
So with grey wolves you are not actually getting 'back' to anything; you're
just proving yet again how malleable the Canids genetics are.
All those with husky/eskimo dogs/malamutes/gsds etc have actually been
doing is starting a new, and less adaptable, type of hybrid, since they all
seem to use northern wolves in their experiments ...
by dantes on 23 January 2013 - 14:01
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
