How close is to close in line bredings - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by troopscott on 10 April 2013 - 11:04

So as I try to lean more about breeding GSD (I do breed thoroughbreds from time to time) I see things that I have questions about. I look at trials, clubs shows etc and just start randomly see what hypothetical matings would look like from dogs pedigrees I can find here.  Here are a couple dogs (names left off because they are not mine) when mated would produce the following. 
 

Line-breeding - 5 generations

  • 4 - 5............................................. in SG Berry vom neuen Lande
  • 4 - 5............................................. in SG Mücke vom Oberhausener-Kreuz
  • 3 - 5............................................. in V Ghana von der kalten Hardt
  • 3 - 4,5........................................... in SG Bandit vom Oberhausener Kreuz
  • 2 - 4............................................. in V Karn vom Fegelhof
  • 3 - 5............................................. in G Iola vom Fegelhof
  • 3 - 5............................................. in G Ingo vom Haus Lohe
  • 2 - 4............................................. in V Chuckie vom Schloß Laer
In the thoroughbred world you could end up with a complete freak of nature that would never be caught or a horse that wont run at all with the 2-4 line breeding. 

Any thoughts on if this is a workable breeding and what it would produce or why it would not work? 

I will say for me I am not a big fan in the horse world of line breeding close.  That is one of the things I like about the Bomber Pup I have coming from Parrish is that there is no line breeding going back 5 generations

  http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/breeding.result?father=500731&mother=1812183

by Paul Garrison on 10 April 2013 - 12:04

I my opinion it all depends on, 1. what are your goals  2. who you are breeding  3. and what are the qualities and faults. Inbreeding and real close line-breeding can produce some of the best and some of the worst in any breeding.  If I did a inbreeding I would never let any of them out of my yard and you should expect to cull very hard, and only breeding the exceptional if there are any.

This may be a can of worms, I hope not.

ziegenfarm

by ziegenfarm on 10 April 2013 - 12:04

as with any animal, some dogs are more preponent than others, some positions on the pedigree are more highly inheritable for certain characteristics and it does make a difference whether a certain dog is coming in thru the dam or the sire. (x vs y--you know)  just going by the dogs listed in the above linebreeding i would expect pups to have stable nerves,
clear head, good obedience and adequate natural aggression.  (good breeding for sport--ipo/schh)  if i were able to choose, i would like to see karn in the sire line and berry coming
thru the dam.  i don't see any red flags in this linebreeding, but ofcourse, subsequent generations are going to have to bring in some new blood.
pjp

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 10 April 2013 - 13:04

You will know when you do it!!  If the sire and dam were line bred (inbred) on the same dogs that you are line breeding them on in the mating it could not go well.  I need to reshuffle the deck with an open breeding at least one third of the time to sleep well. 

vonissk

by vonissk on 10 April 2013 - 15:04

A lot of people inbreed to "prove" their lines. The last breeding I did was a brother/sister--both UKC CH, OFA Good and normal elbows. By the way they were linebred and it definately wasn't a disaster. I remember someone saying they had never seen inbred dogs work. Out of 9 pups, I did have to cull one who had a murmer which had definately gotten worse by her 2nd vet visit. Out of 8--4 are in working homes--2 for service dogs and 2 for working farm dogs. The rest went for pets, all of them went on LTD registration--everyone knew what they were getting and everyone is happy. One of the service dog people called me right before Bolt turned 12 weeks. Why he was opening the door to let himself in and out--well Vicky I told you these dogs were super smart thinking dogs.  I'm not sorry I did it, but I would never do it again with this pair. I've seen what I needed to see--I knew what was behind them or I'd never done it. By know what's behind them, I don't mean what Joe Blow said about the dog--except for a couple of dogs in the 3rd generation, I have had my hands on every dog in the pedigree. And that's the key to inbreeding-KNOWING the dogs. BTW not shouting just emphasizing. So next breeding will be a nice outcross--yes I have a stud picked out and I think they will compliment each other. But that's down the line--I don't do back to back breedings.

by Paul Garrison on 10 April 2013 - 18:04

Take a good look at the first three generations real well because you will see it again if you breed.

Bhaugh

by Bhaugh on 10 April 2013 - 20:04

Didn't we all chastise Hans for a brother/sister breeding? This is my own opinion but I would never breed a brother and sister, no matter how good the lines were. How many other countries is this even allowed?    Barb

Slamdunc

by Slamdunc on 10 April 2013 - 23:04

I think Hans breeding was an oops litter.  He left the two dogs together in a kennel and didn't realize the female was in heat.  If I remember correctly they were very young dogs, a year or younger?  But I could be wrong about the age.

vonissk

by vonissk on 11 April 2013 - 01:04

Yes Hans' litter was an oops litter and he was put down for it. People went on and on like it had never been done before.
Paul you are spot on with that statement. I say that because as the puppies got older--3 weeks and above, I could see different dogs in the lines in those guys. Like wow look at that one, he is Grandpa all over, not only in looks but in actions.
And Barb to you I will say this. If it isn't your cup of tea, then don't do it. You said you would never do it and if you don't have a clue what you're doing, then I sure wouldn't advise it. Inbreeding is a tool--it has a use. One is to prove lines and another is to build lines. Some haven't a clue how it works so therefore they are totally against it.  Some REAL dog people have written books that explains it all like Lloyd Brackett and Patricia Trotter. They both make the whole concept come alive. I don't care how many other countries it's illegal in, that's their problem. It shouldn't be.
Tell me this, is it better to take a chance and SEE what's in those lines and know what to avoid or is it better to just breed to Joe Blow because he's a hard worker and a beautiful color--unless you really know the owner and the dog, you're subject to open up a big can of worms and bring out every recessive in the world. Myself, I don't want that. Iwant dogs that can work and are beautiful while doing it. And if I'm wrong, oh well, I've been wrong before. If I had made a bunch of problem pups, I can guarantee you they wouldn't be in the pound or rescue or given away at wally world--they'd be right here in my back yard--I'm responsible for them after all.

Bhaugh

by Bhaugh on 11 April 2013 - 01:04

That is your opinion Vonissk. I know exactly why it's done. Your making assumptions about me. That's your choice. I've bred dogs as well and I stand by what I said. I'm not sure why you feel you need to put me down because I personally won't do it nor do I support it. But hey to each his own.
Barb





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top