Why can North American GSD breeders never seem to breed world class dogs?? - Page 5

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Blitzen on 10 May 2013 - 10:05

Agree again, Bob. I also found it ironic that in another theread - to title or not - many are stating excuses for not titling before breeding while we are here debating why breeders in the US aren't on par with the European breeders.

by duke1965 on 10 May 2013 - 10:05

as long as you think titled and famous dogs will get you better puppies you will not get anywhere

by Blitzen on 10 May 2013 - 10:05

To each his own, Duke. Speaking for myself, if I  buy a GSD I'm intending to train in IPO, advance OB, whatever I will want to see the appropriate titles on both parents or know good reasons why those dogs are not titled - ie hit by car, can't retrieve over the hurdle. "He/she can do it, he's just not titled", wouldn't be good enough for me. I've only had 4 GSD's since 94 but the one thing I have learned the hard way is - like begets like.

by duke1965 on 10 May 2013 - 10:05

dont misunderstand me blitzen, but I mean that A title is no guarantee for health, quality or the right match to your female, I mean you have to look beyond title and fame and many dont

by Blitzen on 10 May 2013 - 10:05

Gotcha, we are on the same page.

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 10 May 2013 - 11:05

"Not all great dogs are champions, not all champions are great dogs"??  A lot of imported dogs are "flavor of the year" dogs based on who won the BSP or WUSV in the last 5 years??  This has been mentioned previously as breeders jump from one hope for immediate success to another.  Probably too much emphasis on paternal lines and not enough emphasis on maternal lines as maternal lines are crucial for long term success??  Plenty of BSP and BSZS winners who did not have anything to pass on to their progeny that was not just average. "Not all great dogs are champions, not all champions are great dogs".

Prager

by Prager on 10 May 2013 - 11:05

Never? 
Prager Hans
P.S. my question is directed to the premise of the Original post. 

Prager

by Prager on 10 May 2013 - 11:05

Some of the best dogs from Europe  go to USA. But, you can breed two great dogs and still get crap. It depends on how you match them. That depends on how you know genetics of the dogs on the  pedigree. It is hard for most US breeder to know these genetics of these dogs since these dogs are in Europe and they have never seen them.  Also next thing is instead of trying to be perfectionist and lunch a quest for perfect dogs to be bred together, breeders  need to learn ( since there are no perfect dogs in genotype) to compromise and compensate for genetic shortcomings of the sire and dam  and of the dogs on their pedigree, by virtues of the other partner. ( Runaway sentence?Sorry) 
  Prager Hans

by duke1965 on 10 May 2013 - 11:05

have to somewhat disagree hans, every breeder starts out one day, knowing nothing at all, also in europe and everywhere in the world,you have to start somewhere
 seminairs are given on bitework, obedience etc, but never on breeding, someone should open that option, and not start with breeders who produce litter after litter and produce some good or famous dogs, I myself learned alot from breedingprograms in homing pigeons, cattle , horses and so on, so you dont even need to learn from GSD breeders only

by Bob McKown on 10 May 2013 - 11:05

Prager:

                   That also is part of the problem. There is no "Perfect" dog. Every dog has a fault it,s whether the dog can work beyond the fault to overcome it.Looking for the perfect dog is like hunting snipe. 





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top