This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Gustav on 02 July 2013 - 16:07
does that make sense? I'm not criticizing your post, but flushing out the observation you noted and providing proof that it can and has occurred in this breed during the mythical age.....lol
by Markobytes on 02 July 2013 - 16:07
by Markobytes on 02 July 2013 - 16:07
by jemi on 02 July 2013 - 18:07
A balance and sound structure adds speed and maneuverability. The impact of the collision of a bigger and slower dog is actually lesser than the slightly smaller but very fast dog. I don,t want to get bitten by this kind of dog. If he can not clamp me in full grip, he will shred my shirt or pants to pieces, and I don't like to run naked in the street. Watch this.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdYGhuZWYwg
by vk4gsd on 02 July 2013 - 22:07
i find looking at show animals rather sick ie socially acceptable mental illness of humans, don't most enlightened people have come to the conclusion that dancing bears, circus animals, conformation showing, human beauty contests, women jello wrestling while a bunch drunk losers fling them tips etc is just sick to watch and objectifies and degrades the animal/person and degrades the humans that find it somehow amusing or attractive whatever.
what is it competitors/breeders think they are representing when they indulge such practices and the blatant disregard for animal health and welfare to get that more extreme than the other guys already extreme and exaggerated performance??? and what is it that the spectators are cheering/leering about????
i don't get it, i don't like it, there is no moral, utilitarian purpose or even any esthetic value i see.
i think it all comes under the same banner of SICK.
by Hundmutter on 03 July 2013 - 03:07
was deliberately labouring the point that structure in a Showring is
usually nowhere near as awful as some folk believe it to be, at least
until the photographers arrive ! [@akgsd : PLEASE NOTE]
I think what jemi posted is equally reasonable. Unfortunately,
there were plenty of (non-doggy) people - still are, too - who misguidedly
believed the bigger a 'police dog' was, the more it would hurt them.
Often this, it seems, has led to people, who maybe want to breed dogs
the LE services might take, breeding larger animals; and Police and Army
taking them on when offered, 'cos although they may KNOW the lighter
faster dogs are most effective, they also WANT potential perps to "be very afraid" !
by Hundmutter on 03 July 2013 - 03:07
pretty solid grip, too ! Love the 'flying' start.
by johan77 on 03 July 2013 - 08:07
by SitasMom on 03 July 2013 - 09:07
by Blitzen on 03 July 2013 - 09:07
"The height at the withers amounts to 60 cm to 65 cm for male dogs and 55 cm to 60 cm for female dogs. The trunk length exceeds the dimension at the height at the withers by about 10 – 17 %".....the FCI German Shepherd breed standard. Was the size changed or was this the original size in the original standard? There is no mention of weight in the FCI breed standard.
Once again, if one wants to understand why the original breed standard asks for specific points, leave out the police dogs and concentrate on the qualities that were needed for a tending/herding dog. ...why that size.....why dark pigmentation....why longer than tall......why erect ears, complete dentition, scissors bite, well developed underjaw ..... etc.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top